Sunday, July 05, 2009

July 4 by Rick Halperin

July 4, 2009

Across America today, on Independence Day, there will be traditional fireworks, parades, summer fun for children in swimming pools and at ballgames, and a pervasive national outpouring of patriotism, reflected in both flag displays and

the singing of the national anthem at countless events.

There are also almost 3,300 individuals who will not be any

part of these festivities; they are mostly forgotten, despised
and reviled.... they are America's condemned.

They sit on death rows in 34 states, as well as in a military prison in Kansas and a federal facility in Indiana. Most are overwhelmingly guilty of vile, heinous, outrageous and terrible crimes. Many are mentally ill, even profoundly mentally ill, and a good number are innocent of the crimes for which they were convicted. Collectively, they are, in part, responsible for a great deal of anger, hurt, pain and rage in our society.

They face death by firing squad, hanging, electrocution, cyanide gas, and lethal injection (there are more methods of legitimate state-sanctioned execution in the USA than in any other country in the world).

As this nation is trying to emerge from the worst global financial crisis in 70 years, it remains in desperate need of trying to find, uphold and defend its moral soul. We are a long way from accomplishing this important national task.

Most of America's political and judicial leaders, both male and female, in both major parties, remain committed to upholding the ideology and practice of human extermination. As long as any nation in the world, including the USA, retain and practice the barbarism of killing people in the name of the law, they can never be free. If people support, or are indifferent to the liquidation of condemned individuals, how can we be surprised that other horrors, such as torture, hate crimes, and crimes against women, continue at such an alarming pace.

To be sure, some advances in the abolition of the US death penalty have been achieved in the last decade: America has stopped executing its juvenile and mentally retarded offenders; New Jersey and New Mexico have legislatively ended the death penalty, and other states have, in recent years, come close to doing the same. Over 130 innocent people have been released from America's death rows to date, and more will emerge to the free world in the years ahead.

But this "progress" has come at a frustratingly, agonizingly slow pace. Of the 1168 individuals put to death in America since executions resumed in 1977, 736 have occurred since 1998, including 200 just in Texas alone since Rick Perry became governor in 2001. There is no immediate end in sight to this horror.

There will undoubtedly be the traditional praise and self-congratulatory editorials and op-eds in our newspapers today, from coast to coast, from our major cities to our small communities, reminding us of how lucky we are to live in such

a great nation. And in many ways, that sentiment is correct.

But it is a fallacy to believe that assessment when considering what is happening in this country regarding the issue of the death penalty. It is time to face the truth, admit national pain, and come to grips with the fact that on this issue, 233 years after the Declaration of Independence was proclaimed (and 402 years after the British first settled here), we are a national disgrace and failure. We remain wedded to the love of violence, and to the preposterous idea that some people in our society (and even around the world), can be classified as "lesser" or "other" humans, 'deserving' to be stripped of their human dignity, caged like animals for years, physically and psychologically tortured and terrorized, and then ultimately liquidated in the name

of the law.

On this day, when so much celebrating in America will occur, I hope and trust that people will take a hard look at the sobering realities of this nation and its nightmare of the death penalty. Now is the time for all people of conscience, everywhere, to re-dedicate themselves with renewed fervor to end this terrible scourge, so that America may join the ranks of most nations in the world that have long since recognized the links between advancing human progress with ending the death penalty.

When the US does abolish the death penalty, it will then,

and only then, have reasons to be proud and celebrate itself.

Rick Halperin
Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty,
and Amnesty International USA
(Dallas, Texas)

thank you sooooooo much, my Friend, for allowing me to post here !!!

Labels:

14 Comments:

Blogger dudleysharp said...

Incredible. Rick mentions the 3300 murderers on death row who will not be able to celebrate July 4th.

Patheitic, Rick.

What about the approximate 4000 or so murder vicitms who are rotting in the ground? You know, the ones murdered by those 3300?

Yeah, I know, you forgot the real victims.

7/05/2009 7:58 PM  
Blogger dudleysharp said...

The 130 death row "innocence" scam

Re: fact checking issues, on innocence and the death penalty.

It is very important to take note that the 130 exonerated from death row is a blatant scam, easily uncovered by fact checking.

Richard Dieter, head of the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) and DPIC have produced the claims regarding the exonerated and innocents released from death row list.

The scam is that DPIC just decided to redefine what exonerated and innocence mean according to their own perverse definitions.

How Dieter and DPIC define what "exonerated" or "innocent" means.

". . . (DPIC) makes no distinction between legal and factual innocence. " 'They're innocent in the eyes of the law,' Dieter says. 'That's the only objective standard we have.' "

That is untrue, of course. We are all aware of the differences between legal guilt and actual guilt and legal innocence (not guilty) and actual innocence, just as the courts are.

Furthermore, there is no finding of actual innocence, but it is "not guilty". Dieter knows that we are all speaking of actual innocence, those cases that have no connection to the murder(s). He takes advantage of that by redefining exonerated and innocence.

Dieter "clarifies" the three ways that former death row inmates get onto their "exonerated" by "innocence" list.

"A defendant whose conviction is overturned by a judge must be further exonerated in one of three ways: he must be acquitted at a new trial, or the prosecutor must drop the charges against him, or a governor must grant an absolute pardon."

None establishes actual innocence.

DPIC has " . . . included supposedly innocent defendants who were still culpable as accomplices to the actual triggerman."

DPIC: "There may be guilty persons among the innocents, but that includes all of us."

Good grief. DPIC wishes to apply collective guilt of capital murder to all of us.

Dieter states: "I don't think anybody can know about a person's absolute innocence." (Green). Dieter said he could not pinpoint how many are "actually innocent" -- only the defendants themselves truly know that, he said." (Erickson)

Or Dieter won't assert actual innocence in 1, 102 or 350 cases. He doesn't want to clarify a real number with proof of actual innocence, that would blow his entire deception.

Or, Dieter declare all innocent: "If you are not proven guilty in a court of law, you're innocent." (Green)

Dieter would call Hitler and Stalin innocent. Those are his "standards".

And that is the credibility of the DPIC

contd

7/05/2009 8:02 PM  
Blogger dudleysharp said...

contd.

For fact checking.

1. "Case Histories: A Review of 24 Individuals Released from Death Row", Florida Commission on Capital Cases, 6/20/02, Revised 9/10/02 at http://www.floridacapitalcases.state.fl.us/Publications/innocentsproject.pdf

83% error rate in "innocent" claims.

2. "Is 'the innocence list' an appropriate name?", 1/19/03
FRANK GREEN, TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER
http://www.stopcapitalpunishment.org/coverage/106.html

Dieter admits they don't discern between legal innocence and actual innocence. One of Dieter's funnier quotes;"The prosecutor, perhaps, or Dudley Sharp, perhaps, thinks they're still guilty because there was evidence of their guilt, but that's a subjective judgment." Yep, "EVIDENCE OF GUILT", can't you see why Dieter would think they were innocent? And that's how the DPIC works.

3. The Death of Innocents: A Reasonable Doubt,
New York Times Book Review, p 29, 1/23/05, Adam Liptak,
national legal correspondent for The NY Times

"To be sure, 30 or 40 categorically innocent people have been released from death row . . . ".

That is out of the DPIC claimed 119 "exonerated", at that time, for a 75% error rate.

NOTE: It's hard to understand how an absolute can have a differential of 33%. I suggest the "to be sure" is, now, closer to 25.

4. CRITIQUE OF DPIC LIST ("INNOCENCE:FREED FROM DEATH ROW"), Ward Campbell, http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/DPIC.htm


5. "The Death Penalty Debate in Illinois", JJKinsella,6/2000, http://www.dcba.org/brief/junissue/2000/art010600.htm


6.THE DEATH PENALTY - ALL INNOCENCE ISSUES, Dudley Sharp
http://homicidesurvivors.com/2006/03/20/all-innocence-issues--the-death-penalty.aspx

Origins of "innocence" fraud, and review of many innocence issues

7. "Bad List", Ramesh Ponnuru, National Review, 9/16/02
www.nationalreview.com/advance/advance091602.asp#title5

How bad is DPIC?

8. "Not so Innocent", By Ramesh Ponnuru,National Review, 10/1/02
www.nationalreview.com/ponnuru/ponnuru100102.asp

DPIC from bad to worse.

Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters
e-mail sharpjfa@aol.com, 713-622-5491,
Houston, Texas

Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.

A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.

7/05/2009 8:02 PM  
Blogger luisa brehm said...

are you trying to teach me something, Dudley Sharp ???
it’s not my problem you changed your position about death penalty and now you are pro.
no matter if a person is innocent or guilty, death penalty is not just barbarian, it's legalized murder ....
my dear Rick said it all in this great statement !!!

anyway, you forgot to read i am portuguese and, as you should know, Portugal is in Europe and as you should know too we have not death penalty here, gods sake !!! but may be you don't know we were the first Abolitionist european country, in fact we abolished death penalty in 1867.
and what about US ???
you are not very different from China or even Iran, right ???

i will never accept that a country like yours, now so democrat and so one, goes on discussing this issue ....
i was hoping for a change, must confess .... at least of minds ....
well, sure, of course, you cannot change your country in one day ..... and your mind in two ....
but sooner or later we will win, no matter your point of view !!!

luisa

7/06/2009 12:28 AM  
Blogger luisa brehm said...

cont:

i'm an expert researcher, oh yes, so some info about you »

Mr. Dudley Sharp was the Vice President, Political Director, Chairman of the Endorsement Committee and member of the Board of Directors of Justice For All from July 1993 to January 2000. Formerly the Resource Director for JFA until 2003. Justice For All is a criminal justice reform organization based in Houston, Texas.

Mr. Sharp created the process for endorsing political candidates, forming a political endorsement committee, investigating the background of candidates, developing a questionnaire used to explore the candidates true positions on criminal justice and victim’s issues resulting in a committee recommendation for endorsements.

Formerly an opponent of capital punishment, in December 1995 he made himself a death penalty expert and changed his position.

http://lighthousepatriotjournal.wordpress.com/bios-of-guest-writers/dudley-sharp/

7/06/2009 12:30 AM  
Blogger luisa brehm said...

and to end:

some info about my country, just in case you come again

http://bricalu.blogspot.com/2007/01/antes-que-seja-tarde_18.html

7/06/2009 12:31 AM  
Blogger dudleysharp said...

This, from the French daily Le Monde, December 2006 (1):

Percentage of respondents in favor of executing Saddam Hussein:
USA: 82%
Great Britain: 69%
France: 58%
Germany: 53%
Spain: 51%
Italy: 46%


We are led to believe there isn't death penalty support in England or Europe. European governments won't allow executions when their populations support it: they're anti democratic. (2)

(1) The recent results of a poll conducted by Novatris/Harris for the French daily Le Monde on the death penalty shocked the editors and writers at Germany's left-leaning SPIEGEL ONLINE (Dec. 22, 2006). When asked whether they favored the death penalty for Saddam Hussein, a majority of respondents in Germany, France and Spain responded in the affirmative.

(2)An excellent article, “Death in Venice: Europe’s Death-penalty Elitism", details this anti democratic position (The New Republic, by Joshua Micah Marshall, 7/31/2000). Another situation reflects this same mentality. "(Pres. Mandela says 'no' to reinstating the death penalty in South Africa - Nelson Mandela against death penalty though 93% of public favors it, according to poll. "(JET, 10/14/96). Pres. Mandela explained that ". . . it was necessary to inform the people about other strategies the government was using to combat crime." As if the people didn't understand. South Africa has had some of the highest crime rates in the world in the ten years, since Mandela's comments. "The number of murders committed each year in the country is as high as 47,000, according to Interpol statistics." As of 2006, 72% of South Africans want the death penalty back. ("South Africans Support Death Penalty", 5/14/2006, Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research

NOTE: Some recent polls - with no mention of specific crimes.

97%+ of Guatemalans support the death penalty. 2.6% oppose
(telephone survey, newspaper Prensa Libre, 2/14/08)
www(dot)latinamericapress.org/article.asp?lanCode=1&artCode=5545

79% support the resumption of hanging in Jamaica. 16% oppose. (Bill Johnson Polling for The Gleaner (Jamaica) Newspaper, 1/12-13/08

Two-thirds of Czechs for death penalty reintroduction - poll
Prague- Almost two-thirds of Czechs believe that death penalty should exist in the Czech Republic, while one-third believes the opposite, according to a poll the CVVM agency conducted in May and released. June 12, 2008, Ceskenoviny.cz/news/

7/06/2009 12:37 AM  
Blogger dudleysharp said...

If you don't care about innocent murder vicitms or about accuracy, then I can see why you would praise Rick Halperin's quote.

If you are a researcher, fact check, prior to putting articles on your site.

It would be helpful for you and your readers.

7/06/2009 12:39 AM  
Blogger luisa brehm said...

Portugal ??? 0%, without counting the idiots, of course ....
and you say we are anti democratic, bingo !!!
i almost have my eyes wide.

but thanks for your visit, Dudley, since a time ago i had not so many comments ....

7/06/2009 12:49 AM  
Blogger dudleysharp said...

You are most welcome.

I love Portugal, btw

7/06/2009 2:08 AM  
Blogger luisa brehm said...

you are welcome too but i guess you have noticed my blog is not just about death penalty.

7/06/2009 2:20 PM  
Blogger dudleysharp said...

Luisa:

I suspect Portugal was not a part of the polling. I think you and I both know that more than 0% of Portugeze would support Saddam's execution.

My rational point is that just because China and Iran have the death penalty, that does not make tem, remotely like the US, just as Portugal has prisons, so does China. That doesn't make China and Portugal moral equals.

Even if China didn't have the death penalty, they would still be a horribly restrictive totalitarian regime, that I would not compare to either the US or Portugal.

Had the poll covered all of the EU, I suspect the majority of the respondents would have supported the execution of Saddam.

Polling responses to not make the death penalty right or wrong.

Obviously, I don't believe that non death penalty countries are more moral than death penalty countries, based upon the death penalty alone.

I find the death penalty to be a just, moral and appropriate punishment for some crimes. If I didn't, I wouldn't support it.

It is, generally, the same for all people that support criminal sanctions, of any kind.

We just disagree on the death penalty, which I find just and moral and which you find immoral.

7/06/2009 4:40 PM  
Blogger dudleysharp said...

Please note that I really make an effort to avoid personal attacks, such as "idiots".Many idiots and many intellectuals support or oppose capital punishment.

7/06/2009 5:03 PM  
Blogger luisa brehm said...

Dudley,
to tell the true i don't believe in polls, they are far of being correct and these ones you keep talking are from Bush era .... it's over now !!!

i was deeply shocked with Saddam assassination, portuguese people too,
europeans either and i believe whole world was ....
do you think Bush should be executed ??? i don't think so but, must confess,
i would love to see him sit in the ICC for crimes against humanity ....

times have changed, Dudley, you have a new president, you should keep your eyes open to the future, not to the past ....

as for the "idiots", it was not a personal attack, i was talking about people in general.

don't you like poetry or art ??? to talk about other things ???
because this is my last comment in this post !!!

have a very happy week !!!

7/06/2009 7:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home